Menu
 
Home | News | Flood Scheme Forum
 
News | 19th October 2020
 

Flood Scheme Forum

 
 
 

RESIDENTS living in riverside properties in Langholm have voiced their opposition to the proposed flood defences.

The E&L Advertiser contacted and visited a number of people in Mary Street, Frances Street, Caroline Street and Elizabeth Street to ask them for their views and no-one was in favour of this design.

John Basnett of Caroline Street said: “I think they’re a good thing if they’re done properly. I’m not sure they’re necessary.

“I was here in 1977 and no-one got flooded but the park and church were.

“My biggest concern is access to the river. We ride our horses from the Stubholm and cross the ford on our horses but there will be no ford.

“I went to the consultation to look at the plans and the man I spoke to knew nothing about the ford.”

John thought a gate would be okay in the flood wall but, otherwise, his only option would be to ride down to Skippers Bridge. He would not want to ride through the church grounds.

He said he would raise his query during the 28-day consultation period after the flood order was published by Dumfries and Galloway Council.

He was also concerned about surface water flooding and dredging the gravel from the river which hampered the flow of the river so the water backed up.

Roy Park of Caroline Street said: “It’s a waste of money because the river will never flood and I don’t think it’ll be any worse in the future. I didn’t attend the consultations.”

Nancy McLure of Caroline Street said she went to the consultation in February and was “absolutely stunned”.

“Diverting the river through the park is shocking and the heights of the wall through the town.

“People in Langholm love their rivers and views and not being able to see the water is dreadful. It’s going to change the character of Langholm forever. Is it worth it for a 1 in 200-year flood?”

Nancy asked the consultants whether they had been in Langholm during a flood when the water went into the park.

She said: “They didn’t know that. The scheme was all based on computer projections.

“I worry about the pool corner and the damaged wall. The water has been through several times. It doesn’t seem to get any maintenance.

“The water has never been into Caroline Street. The late John Reid, who was 80 when he died, had never seen water over the railings.

“We all have to encompass change but it’s the shocking nature of this scheme.

“It’s the little things, like opening the curtains in the morning and seeing the birdlife on the water. It’s so important. The view in Caroline Street is unsurpassed in all senses.

“Over the past seven months the outdoors and wildlife has become so important to us and to have this view of the river and riverbank no matter where you live in the town.”

Kathleen Baxter lives in Waterside with husband, John.

She said: “I did go to the meetings and I’m very much against the scheme.

“I don’t want to have to stand on Langholm bridge and see walls all the way down.

“The consultants (RPS) also didn’t know that the householders in Waterside owned the land in front of their houses out to the middle of the river. They should have known that.

“It seems to be a very big expense for something which may happen. Like a lot of people, I think they could dredge the river.”

She added: “I think the embankment is far too high. Why is it so high when we’ve never been flooded.

“And I can’t understand why they would put a footpath on top of it. Is it going to be safe?

“It doesn’t seem to make sense and will it infringe out privacy? Nothing seems to be very clear.”

She believed something should be done in George Street because it was the one street with a flooding problem.

She also thinks the gravel should be dredged from under the church bridge, saying: “When we played there as children, there was no gravel.”

May George of Elizabeth Street did not go to the consultations because she felt she didn’t know enough to argue against it but she knew she didn’t want it.

She said: “I’m certainly not in favour of what I’m seeing. I don’t think it’s necessary.

“Maybe something is needed but not to the extent they are going to.

“I’ve lived in Langholm for 71 years and I’ve never been evacuated to the monument. A few years ago they supplied sandbags but it would take an awful lot of water to reach here.

“For those of us, who park our cars in Elizabeth Street, which is all of us, we will still park here so how are people going to get up and down the street with the pavement and flowers.

“I like looking out the window at the river and I don’t want to look at a wall.”

Sandra Graham of Elizabeth Street said she was not keen on it at all for several reasons.

“I feel, and I could be wrong, but during lockdown all those stones could have been removed. A lot of clearing out could have been done to improve the river flow.

“I’ve been in my house for 20 years and the water’s never been to the railings. The last time was in 1977.

“I don’t like the design. I think it’s going to spoil a beautiful part of the river, with its lovely trees and walks. It’ll change the whole look of the place and not for the better.”

She thought the overflow channel through the park would not work.

Elaine Anderson of Mary Street said: “I’ve been here since 1968 and we don’t flood. My aunt was in the house next door from 1933 and she was never flooded.

“In the big flood in 1977 the water came up to the fence below the garden but not into the garden.”

She said that, depending on whether the Ewes came down first or the Esk, the water behaved differently.

If the Esk was first, it didn’t turn round the corner, but went straight across towards the Kilngreen. Often, it was the Castleholm which flooded.

Elaine said the residents rented their gardens from Buccleuch and the drying green was there for everyone to use.

She added: “No-one has said anything about our gardens. We’ve heard nothing.”

“When I went to the consultation, I told them that the gravel should be taken out. They practically scoffed at me.”

Elaine said she remembered a time when, while crossing the suspension bridge, there was water across the whole width of the Esk. Builders used to get the gravel out regularly.

Drew Weatherstone of Frances Street said: “I think it’s going to be an eyesore. If they cut down the trees here, the banking will be lost.”

He and his wife, Louise, also rent their garden from Buccleuch but he has not had any correspondence from anyone about it.

He added: “If they said global warming was going to cause more rainfall, then, yes, but I think there are other things they can do, like measures upstream, in the hills.”

 
 
Would you like to support us?

The Eskdale and Liddesdale Advertiser is our community owned local newspaper and even in today’s troubled times, we aim to bring you local news and articles in an impartial, responsible and factual way.

We hope you have enjoyed reading this free article but we need your support so we can keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and independent and keeps you up to date with what is happening in Eskdale and Liddesdale.

Every reader’s contribution, however big or small, is so valuable to us.
 
 
‘Owned by the Community...Published for the Community’
Do you have a story?

Please get in touch if you have a story or article you would like to see published.

Related Articles

Castleholm is officially in community hands

Landmark deal sees cherished land transferred to the people of…

 

Hope Hospital shines in Excellence in Care inspection

The Thomas Hope hospital in Langholm recently had a six-month…

 

Emergency services rescue woman from chilly River Esk

Firefighters from Langholm, Annan, Dumfries and Gala required as water…

 

Disappointment with LINK’S response to cash worries

Cash machine company not a lot of help in finding…

 

Holiday village plans for Irvine House and grounds

Buccleuch’s vision for up to 150 lodges couldbenefit Langholm businesses…

 

Town loses out on funding due to mis-reported population

Discrepancy between census statistics andBorderlands figures has cost Langholm dear…

 

Banking possibilities under investigation

After announced closure of Bank of Scotland,solutions including a Post…

 

All kinds of everything at the 172nd Langholm Show

MAIRI TELFORD JAMMEH reports on Langholm’s Rural Highlight in an 8-Page Supplement…

 

15 nights road closure for A7 improvements

Overnight works to resurface road south of Canonbie will run…

 

Signage, speed limit, flooding and potholes

An update from the A7 Action Group’s meeting The A7…

 

Bank of Scotland to close Langholm branch

As High Street loses its last remaining bank,residents are saying…

 

Inaction by BT leaves Hub incommunicado

Eskdalemuir venue unable to function properly without phoneline or broadband…

 

Nearly 1,000 objections to Warblaw Woodlands

Langholm locals object to commercial forestry on their doorstep An…

 

Depression on David Street to be tackled

and other updates from Councillor Male After many months of…

 

Warblaw worries are endorsed by politicians

MSP Oliver Mundell urges residents to join Warblaw fight ahead…

 

Golden time in Paris for Copshaw’s Paralympian

Team GB Paralympic swimmer Stephen Clegg ALSO breaks long-standing record…what…

 

Teachers face up to the Great North Run

In March this year, Headteacher of the Langholm and Canonbie…

 

Residents encouraged to react to Warblaw plans

If you are against the blanket of trees proposedfor our…

 

Consultation on change of school week structure

Views, opinions and concerns sought from parents/carers Dumfries and Galloway…

 

Letters to the Editor

More Warblaw worries With reference to Mark Hallam’s letter of…

 

Show Season starts with Canonbie's fine flower-power

Mairi Telford Jammeh reports from Canonbie Flower Show and vintage…

 

Much opposition to plan for Warblaw woodlands

Action Group formed to challenge forestry company’s ‘blanket of trees’…

 

Langholm Common Riding 2024

 

Common Riding Gallery 2024

Lots more photos in this week’s E&L. Many thanks to…

 

Over 100 years of Thomas Hope service between them

Angela, Kate and Sheena have all worked in a job…

 

Three of the best

Everyone at the E&L and Muckle Toon Media wish Bailey…

 

Have your say on the future of Langholm Housing

New survey aims to gather opinion on what the town…

 

Castle Craigs Rideout in photos

 

Holes filled, wall secured

At least the Common Riding route is more or less…

 

Future-proofing the Common Riding

No less than 63 ponies and their riders sallied forth…

 

Langholm Common Riding 2024

And so it begins… It was a wee bit on…

 

The Langholm Alliance: facing challenges head-on

‘Despite funding limitations, we are dedicated to transforming Langholm into…

 

Wildfires cause Greek Island holiday scare

A Langholm couple on holiday, in Kardamena on the idyllic…

 

Mighty Hikers Mel and Karl raise over £4k for Cancer Care

Local couple walk in Wales to support charity dear to…

 

Pureous Bunkumos

Saturday dawned bright and beautiful for the Copshaw Common Riding,…

 

Envisioning D&G's future landscape

Ideas for the future landscape of Dumfries and Galloway were…

 

20 WILL BE plenty!

 Blanket 20mph limit for all Langholm streets plus more…

 

Team work helps secure Langholm Day Centre

Manager Sandra Graham pulls out all the stops to negotiate…

 

DGRI cyber attack leads to region-wide mailing

CEO will contact every household in region with online safety…

 

EDF presents revised plans for windfarm near Copshaw

Revised plans for a major new windfarm to be sited…

 
 
requires mailchimp logins and wired up to a list
Join our mailing list
Keep up to date with all that’s going on at the E&L
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.